Journal cover Journal topic
Geoscientific Instrumentation, Methods and Data Systems An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
Geosci. Instrum. Method. Data Syst., 3, 153-177, 2014
© Author(s) 2014. This work is distributed
under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Research article
01 Sep 2014
CLUSTER–STAFF search coil magnetometer calibration – comparisons with FGM
P. Robert1, N. Cornilleau-Wehrlin1,2, R. Piberne1, Y. de Conchy2, C. Lacombe2, V. Bouzid1, B. Grison3, D. Alison1, and P. Canu1 1Laboratoire de Physique des Plasmas, CNRS, Palaiseau, France
2LESIA-Observatoire de Paris, CNRS, Meudon, France
3Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Prague, Czech Republic
Abstract. The main part of the Cluster Spatio-Temporal Analysis of Field Fluctuations (STAFF) experiment consists of triaxial search coils allowing the measurements of the three magnetic components of the waves from 0.1 Hz up to 4 kHz. Two sets of data are produced, one by a module to filter and transmit the corresponding waveform up to either 10 or 180 Hz (STAFF-SC), and the second by the onboard Spectrum Analyser (STAFF-SA) to compute the elements of the spectral matrix for five components of the waves, 3 × B and 2 × E (from the EFW experiment), in the frequency range 8 Hz to 4 kHz.

In order to understand the way the output signals of the search coils are calibrated, the transfer functions of the different parts of the instrument are described as well as the way to transform telemetry data into physical units across various coordinate systems from the spinning sensors to a fixed and known frame. The instrument sensitivity is discussed. Cross-calibration inside STAFF (SC and SA) is presented. Results of cross-calibration between the STAFF search coils and the Cluster Fluxgate Magnetometer (FGM) data are discussed. It is shown that these cross-calibrations lead to an agreement between both data sets at low frequency within a 2% error. By means of statistics done over 10 yr, it is shown that the functionalities and characteristics of both instruments have not changed during this period.

Citation: Robert, P., Cornilleau-Wehrlin, N., Piberne, R., de Conchy, Y., Lacombe, C., Bouzid, V., Grison, B., Alison, D., and Canu, P.: CLUSTER–STAFF search coil magnetometer calibration – comparisons with FGM, Geosci. Instrum. Method. Data Syst., 3, 153-177, doi:10.5194/gi-3-153-2014, 2014.
Publications Copernicus