Journal cover Journal topic
Geoscientific Instrumentation, Methods and Data Systems An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
Journal topic

Journal metrics

Journal metrics

  • IF value: 1.302 IF 1.302
  • IF 5-year value: 1.356 IF 5-year
    1.356
  • CiteScore value: 1.47 CiteScore
    1.47
  • SNIP value: 0.810 SNIP 0.810
  • IPP value: 1.37 IPP 1.37
  • SJR value: 0.598 SJR 0.598
  • Scimago H <br class='hide-on-tablet hide-on-mobile'>index value: 8 Scimago H
    index 8
  • h5-index value: 14 h5-index 14
Volume 3, issue 1
Geosci. Instrum. Method. Data Syst., 3, 1-11, 2014
https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-3-1-2014
© Author(s) 2014. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

Special issue: Calibration methods and results of the in-situ experiments...

Geosci. Instrum. Method. Data Syst., 3, 1-11, 2014
https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-3-1-2014
© Author(s) 2014. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

Research article 22 Jan 2014

Research article | 22 Jan 2014

Interinstrument calibration using magnetic field data from the flux-gate magnetometer (FGM) and electron drift instrument (EDI) onboard Cluster

R. Nakamura1, F. Plaschke1, R. Teubenbacher1,*, L. Giner2, W. Baumjohann1, W. Magnes1, M. Steller1, R. B. Torbert3, H. Vaith3, M. Chutter3, K.-H. Fornaçon4, K.-H. Glassmeier4, and C. Carr5 R. Nakamura et al.
  • 1Space Research Institute, Austrian Academy of Sciences, 8042 Graz, Austria
  • 2Graz University of Technology, 8010 Graz, Austria
  • 3University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH 03824, USA
  • 4Institut für Geophysik und extraterrestrische Physik, Technische Universität Braunschweig, 38106 Braunschweig, Germany
  • 5Blackett Laboratory, Imperial College London, London, UK
  • *now at: Materials Center Leoben Forschung GmbH, Leoben, Austria

Abstract. We compare the magnetic field data obtained from the flux-gate magnetometer (FGM) and the magnetic field data deduced from the gyration time of electrons measured by the electron drift instrument (EDI) onboard Cluster to determine the spin-axis offset of the FGM measurements. Data are used from orbits with their apogees in the magnetotail, when the magnetic field magnitude was between about 20 and 500 nT. Offset determination with the EDI–FGM comparison method is of particular interest for these orbits, because no data from solar wind are available in such orbits to apply the usual calibration methods using the Alfvén waves. In this paper, we examine the effects of the different measurement conditions, such as direction of the magnetic field relative to the spin plane and field magnitude in determining the FGM spin-axis offset, and also take into account the time-of-flight offset of the EDI measurements. It is shown that the method works best when the magnetic field magnitude is less than about 128 nT and when the magnetic field is aligned near the spin-axis direction. A remaining spin-axis offset of about 0.4 ∼ 0.6 nT was observed for Cluster 1 between July and October 2003. Using multipoint multi-instrument measurements by Cluster we further demonstrate the importance of the accurate determination of the spin-axis offset when estimating the magnetic field gradient.

Publications Copernicus
Special issue
Download
Citation
Share