Journal cover Journal topic
Geoscientific Instrumentation, Methods and Data Systems An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
Journal topic

Journal metrics

Journal metrics

  • IF value: 1.302 IF 1.302
  • IF 5-year value: 1.356 IF 5-year
    1.356
  • CiteScore value: 1.47 CiteScore
    1.47
  • SNIP value: 0.810 SNIP 0.810
  • IPP value: 1.37 IPP 1.37
  • SJR value: 0.598 SJR 0.598
  • Scimago H <br class='hide-on-tablet hide-on-mobile'>index value: 8 Scimago H
    index 8
  • h5-index value: 14 h5-index 14
Volume 6, issue 2
Geosci. Instrum. Method. Data Syst., 6, 269–277, 2017
https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-6-269-2017
© Author(s) 2017. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

Special issue: The Earth’s magnetic field: measurements, data, and applications...

Geosci. Instrum. Method. Data Syst., 6, 269–277, 2017
https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-6-269-2017
© Author(s) 2017. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

Research article 18 Jul 2017

Research article | 18 Jul 2017

An automatic DI-flux at the Livingston Island geomagnetic observatory, Antarctica: requirements and lessons learned

Santiago Marsal et al.

Viewed

Total article views: 1,070 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
715 313 42 1,070 24 48
  • HTML: 715
  • PDF: 313
  • XML: 42
  • Total: 1,070
  • BibTeX: 24
  • EndNote: 48
Views and downloads (calculated since 16 Mar 2017)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 16 Mar 2017)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 1,047 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 1,041 with geography defined and 6 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Saved (final revised paper)

No saved metrics found.

Saved (preprint)

No saved metrics found.

Discussed (final revised paper)

No discussed metrics found.

Discussed (preprint)

No discussed metrics found.
Latest update: 27 May 2020
Publications Copernicus
Download
Short summary
Commercial solutions for an automated DI-flux are practically reduced to the AutoDIF and the GyroDIF. We analyze the pros and cons of both in terms of suitability at the Livingston Island geomagnetic observatory, Antarctica. We conclude that the GyroDIF is more suitable for harsh conditions due to its simpler infrastructure. We also show the instrument housing design and its control electronics. Our experiences can benefit the geomagnetic community, which often faces similar challenges.
Commercial solutions for an automated DI-flux are practically reduced to the AutoDIF and the...
Citation