Journal cover Journal topic
Geoscientific Instrumentation, Methods and Data Systems An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union

Journal metrics

  • IF value: 1.023 IF 1.023
  • IF 5-year<br/> value: 1.557 IF 5-year
    1.557
  • CiteScore<br/> value: 0.86 CiteScore
    0.86
  • SNIP value: indexed SNIP
    indexed
  • SJR value: indexed SJR
    indexed
  • IPP value: indexed IPP
    indexed
  • h5-index value: 10 h5-index 10
Geosci. Instrum. Method. Data Syst., 6, 419-427, 2017
https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-6-419-2017
© Author(s) 2017. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Research article
17 Oct 2017
U.S. Geological Survey experience with the residual absolutes method
E. William Worthington1 and Jürgen Matzka2 1U.S. Geological Survey, Geomagnetism Program, P.O. Box 25046, MS 966, Denver, CO 80225, USA
2GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences, Telegrafenberg, 14473 Potsdam, Germany
Abstract. The U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) Geomagnetism Program has developed and tested the residual method of absolutes, with the assistance of the Danish Technical University's (DTU) Geomagnetism Program. Three years of testing were performed at College Magnetic Observatory (CMO), Fairbanks, Alaska, to compare the residual method with the null method. Results show that the two methods compare very well with each other and both sets of baseline data were used to process the 2015 definitive data. The residual method will be implemented at the other USGS high-latitude geomagnetic observatories in the summer of 2017 and 2018.

Citation: Worthington, E. W. and Matzka, J.: U.S. Geological Survey experience with the residual absolutes method, Geosci. Instrum. Method. Data Syst., 6, 419-427, https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-6-419-2017, 2017.
Publications Copernicus
Download
Short summary
We have compared two methods of performing Absolute observations of the Earth's magnetic field. The newer, Residual method was evaluated for use at USGS geomagnetic observatories and compared with measurements using the traditional Null method. A mathematical outline of the Residual method is presented, including more precise conversions of the Declination angles to nanoTeslas (nT). Results show that the Residual method is better than the Null method, especially at high latitude.
We have compared two methods of performing Absolute observations of the Earth's magnetic field....
Share