Journal cover Journal topic
Geoscientific Instrumentation, Methods and Data Systems An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
Journal topic

Journal metrics

Journal metrics

  • IF value: 1.319 IF 1.319
  • IF 5-year value: 1.299 IF 5-year
    1.299
  • CiteScore value: 1.27 CiteScore
    1.27
  • SNIP value: 0.740 SNIP 0.740
  • SJR value: 0.598 SJR 0.598
  • IPP value: 1.21 IPP 1.21
  • h5-index value: 12 h5-index 12
  • Scimago H <br class='hide-on-tablet hide-on-mobile'>index value: 6 Scimago H
    index 6
GI | Articles | Volume 8, issue 1
Geosci. Instrum. Method. Data Syst., 8, 21-27, 2019
https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-8-21-2019
© Author(s) 2019. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Geosci. Instrum. Method. Data Syst., 8, 21-27, 2019
https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-8-21-2019
© Author(s) 2019. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Research article 30 Jan 2019

Research article | 30 Jan 2019

The operator difference in absolute geomagnetic measurements

Yufei He et al.
Related subject area  
Data quality
The influence of sample geometry on the permeability of a porous sandstone
Michael J. Heap
Geosci. Instrum. Method. Data Syst. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-2018-42,https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-2018-42, 2018
Revised manuscript accepted for GI
Short summary
One second vector and scalar magnetic measurements at the low-latitude Choutuppal (CPL) magnetic observatory
Nelapatla Phani Chandrasekhar, Sai Vijay Kumar Potharaju, Kusumita Arora, Chandra Shakar Rao Kasuba, Leonid Rakhlin, Sergey Tymoshyn, Laszlo Merenyi, Anusha Chilukuri, Jayashree Bulusu, and Sergey Khomutov
Geosci. Instrum. Method. Data Syst., 6, 547-560, https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-6-547-2017,https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-6-547-2017, 2017
Short summary
Data quality control and tools in passive seismic experiments exemplified on the Czech broadband seismic pool MOBNET in the AlpArray collaborative project
Luděk Vecsey, Jaroslava Plomerová, Petr Jedlička, Helena Munzarová, Vladislav Babuška, and the AlpArray working group
Geosci. Instrum. Method. Data Syst., 6, 505-521, https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-6-505-2017,https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-6-505-2017, 2017
Short summary
Time-stamp correction of magnetic observatory data acquired during unavailability of time-synchronization services
Pierdavide Coïsson, Kader Telali, Benoit Heumez, Vincent Lesur, Xavier Lalanne, and Chang Jiang Xin
Geosci. Instrum. Method. Data Syst., 6, 311-317, https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-6-311-2017,https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-6-311-2017, 2017
Short summary
Stability analysis of geomagnetic baseline data obtained at Cheongyang observatory in Korea
Shakirah M. Amran, Wan-Seop Kim, Heh Ree Cho, and Po Gyu Park
Geosci. Instrum. Method. Data Syst., 6, 231-238, https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-6-231-2017,https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-6-231-2017, 2017
Short summary
Cited articles  
Auster, H. U. and Auster, V.: A new method for performing an absolute measurement of the geomagnetic field, Meas. Sci. Technol., 14, 1013, https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-0233/14/7/315, 2003. 
Bitterly, J. J., Cantin, M., Schlich, R., Folques, J., and Gilbert D.: Portable magnetometer theodolite with fluxgate sensor for earth's magnetic field component measurements, Geophys. Surv., 6, 233–239, https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-0233/14/7/315, 1984.  
Brunke, H.-P. and Matzka, J.: Numerical evaluation of magnetic absolute measurements with arbitrarily distributed DI-fluxgate theodolite orientations, Geosci. Instrum. Method. Data Syst., 7, 1–9, https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-7-1-2018, 2018. 
Deng, N., Yang, D. M., Yang, Y. F., and Chen, J.: On problems of absolute measurement in geomagnetic observatory, J. Geodesy, 30, 129–134, https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1671-5942.2010.z1.029, 2010. 
Gonsette, A., Rasson, J., and Humbled, F.: In situ vector calibration of magnetic observatories, Geosci. Instrum. Method. Data Syst., 6, 361–366, https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-6-361-2017, 2017a. 
Publications Copernicus
Download
Citation
Share